Monday, August 6, 2007

"IN THE KNOW": "Mr. and Mrs. North and South America and all ships at sea," "Let’s go to press!

"IN THE KNOW": "Mr. and Mrs. North and South America and all ships at sea," "Let’s go to press!


Just got back from hooking some Big Reds at the Mother Lagoon. Now, that's WATT I'm talkin bout invoking a FIGHT. I had not had an opportunity to read the Caller Times and Jamie Powell's Political Pulse and one of the guys came up and starting telling us how Junior John attacked the internet community and Mikal WATTSFORSENATE Campaign amateur. He said, "They are talking about you all over the Newspaper today". I asked him, "What do you mean? Who is "they"?

He said that Senator guy Cornyn, he is saying that the blogs and the internet message are an amateur way for WATTS to Campaign. He is saying Mikal Watts but he is talking about you.

Well, I am not with the WATTSFORSENATE Campaign but I am going against Junior John.

The said to me, you must be starting to irritate them, getting to them with things they cannot defend or else he wouldn't say anything.

I told him, "I am a fly, and I am going a Junior John, I am now in his ear, He will scratch and scratch at his ear trying to get me out, he will scratch until he is bleeding, he will himself to death trying to get me out of his ear."
Rothenberg Report, calling Watts' campaign Web site video, "the silliest, most transparent attempt to deliver a message I have ever seen."
Who is Rothenberg and why should we care WATT he says? It is enough to know he is trying to get Junior John re-elected. His writing is meaningless rhetoric. Transparent? Transparency is a good thing, but obviously transparency is a negative attribute of Government according to the GOP?
"If this is Mikal Watts' first attempt to draw attention to his campaign via the Internet he may ought to use another medium," said Texas GOP spokesman Hans Klingler. "Watts invoking the word 'fight' without the slightest idea or experience in any elected or leadership arena is comical."

We (Los Kenedenos) were going after Junior John prior to any Watts intentions to challenge the Junior Senator. Besides, why would a GOP Spokesman advise us? We are definitely in a good medium current or else ole Hans would not be advising us to "use another medium". We are definitely connecting with the "sweet spot" and they keep on changing pitchers. As far as fight, come and get it BOYS. Amateur, we take that as a compliment and it is a true statement, in our case.

WATT are you scared of Junior John?

Bring it now and may we dance everyday until the day when Texas will make their choice.

Invoking the word Fight?
"without the slightest idea or experience in any elected or leadership arena"


We know WATT Junior John's idea of leadership is, it is a sycophantic relationship with the GOP.

Junior John's Experience is his record and there is nothing there for the average Texan, there is nothing in his record for the South Texan or for the hispanic.

We got him building a border fence that was appropriated for, as a Concrete WAll.

Invoke the word FIGHT Mr Hans exclaims?

We will take our chances.

We stand waiting in the ring or in the alley whichever you choose Mr Hans Klingler.

As far as leadership and elected arenas, we got Junior John's record vs the hope that somebody has the balls to run his A$$ out of office.

We are here and the hope begins to grow.












The snowball now, only needs a little downward slope and then we just jump on for the ride.
We wont need to support it anymore and you guys cant stop it, it will just keep rolling and rolling and rolling.















You GOP guys, doncha you got a little better punch than that to throw? Where is all that salty dog experience of the "Professional Politician / Carpet Bagger"?


You know WATT I mean by Professional Carpetbagger?

  • come around only at election time
  • say and do WATT ever it takes to get re elected.
  • Quiet up about the Craddick transgressions even though you should denounce him,
  • mums the word on building a wall but let the racist haters know you still support it
  • and charm the Humanities and let them know you are for them and have always supported them
  • like you tried to you act like you are for the American GI Forum and have always supported the Hispanic culture in that plagiarized article in some East Texas Publication; where you were trying to use the image and spirit of DR Hector P Garcia.
Junior John is now officially a comedian.

Well he must be?
Isn't he trying to make us laugh?

Surely Junior John does not think we are stupid enough to believe his Cotton Eyed Joe song and Dance?


WATTS that word?

B U L L S H / T ! ! !




GOP suggests Watts' campaign is amateur

The Texas Republican Party went on the offensive Friday against lawyer Mikal Watts, who is making a run at Republican U.S. Sen. John Cornyn.

The state GOP cited a recent article by Stuart Rothenberg, author of the national political publication Rothenberg Report, calling Watts' campaign Web site video, "the silliest, most transparent attempt to deliver a message I have ever seen."

"If this is Mikal Watts' first attempt to draw attention to his campaign via the Internet he may ought to use another medium," said Texas GOP spokesman Hans Klingler. "Watts invoking the word 'fight' without the slightest idea or experience in any elected or leadership arena is comical."

2 comments:

dannoynted1 said...

OK Supreme Court reverses malpractice judgments
Journal Record, The (Oklahoma City), Nov 21, 2006 by Janice Francis-Smith
<< Page 1 Continued from page 1. Previous | Next

"None of that (tort reform bills) will ever say what an expert has to say," said Mike Seney, vice president of operations for The State Chamber. "That's up to the lawyers to elicit from the expert. What we're looking for is, if you're going to have an expert, let them be an expert in the area they are testifying to."

Business and medical groups have stated their intent to again lobby the Legislature in 2007 to pass additional tort reform - also called lawsuit reform - measures in Oklahoma. Supporters of tort reform legislation say the changes proposed would make it more difficult for people to subject businesses or doctors to "frivolous" lawsuits, motivated by a desire to win an unduly large monetary award.

Lawyers who file such cases are well aware that oftentimes a business or physician will choose to settle such cases out of court to avoid the expense and effort of a protracted legal battle, and so attorneys may file a lawsuit "just to see what they can get," said Seney.

"If you're going to argue science, you better be able to put it on in front of a panel of scientists," said Seney regarding expert witness testimony. "What we have are people who are throwing ideas and concepts out there, and the courts allowing that to go to the jury. There's also the problem - on both sides - of how much these experts are getting paid. You want to see junk science at its best? Look at the asbestos and silicosis cases."
Advertisement

Last year, U.S. District Judge Janis Jack threw out the testimony of certain "expert" doctors, sanctioned lawyers and discredited a system of mass screenings that produced thousands of new silicosis claims within just a few years. The judge said it appears the claims were "manufactured for money."

Seney said the aim is to require anyone filing a claim of injury or illness to present medical evidence to show that they actually suffered an injury or illness.

"It's time for our courts to get tough and start not just throwing these cases out, but to throw them out and assess damages against the lawyers who brought them," said Seney.

Copyright 2006 Dolan Media Newswires
Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved.

dannoynted1 said...

Cut your balls off accidentally, guess if you sue it is lawsuit abuse.

I am so sick of these people paid by the insurance industry to pander to the catholic guilt for a fee of course.

Lawsuit Abuse is not providing the coverage to which you have been compensated for,

If the Physician insurance industry is too stupid to insure a quack then their just as guilty,

The whole purpose is "covered" or "coverage" not to promote the quacks because TLR got into bed with the insurance industry,,,,,,


So let me refresh your memory the fanatical four that is TLR their stentoric energizer bunny, confirmed he took advantage because he could.


"The disengagement of the average citizen in the formulation of public policy" is why they got away with it.


Probably the most honest money hungry display of elevating through destruction of the moral fiber of corporate America who could care less about the average citizen.

Too bad when you go TLR and ilk you can't take not 1 PENNY with you........ahh, he gets tears just thinking about it.